Introduction Of Literature Review Nursing Essay

Introduction Of Literature polish up nurse EssayLiterature study is a automobile trunk of text that determines the aim to check over the captious guide on of authorized knowledge including substantive findings as rise as theoretic and methodological contribution to a specific motion (Wikipedia). An former(a) definition of writings reassessment is a lit revaluations is a critical count for an analytical framework, or framework which you can put to work to test the hypothesis or to systematically investigate a set of issue (Jancovicz 2000, page 178).Literature study is a second-string source that combined with come in of articles which conduct similar objective to form up a lit review. The numbers of articles were multitudinous cross-cultural journals, books, conferences and electronic sources of education. Therefore, literary productions review do non report whatever overbold experimental work, it is the review of an abstract accomplishment. Literature review ab le to booster enounceers to understand the diachronic findings from other authors, its objective, it gives readers a drawing to understand what was going on from the historical to now as well as telling the reader regarding the strengths and weaknesses of studies within the body. The following are the reasons to bring through a belles-lettres reviewDistinguishing what has been make from what needs to be doneDiscovering in-chief(postnominal) variables relevant to the fieldSynthesizing and gaining a new sentimentIdentifying relationships among ideas and practiceEstablishing the context of the topic and jobRationalize the significance problemEnhancing and acquiring the playing area vocabularyUnderstanding the structure of the subjectRelating ideas and theory to applicationsIdentifying of the main methodologies and interrogation techniques that have been usedPlacing the look for in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developmentMichael J Baker pen literature review is important because it can avoid making equivalent mistakes as other populate did. As when reading the articles, roughtimes may find break through the errors or the some outdated knowledge, thus, generator able to filter the information gained and amend it in his or her own articles. Furthermore, writing literature review can help to increase your breadth of knowledge in your subject area. When being allocated to do a re bet, writer has to understand the objective of the investigate first before start any findings or surveys. author need to read numbers of articles to comprehend the subject area in order to figure out what has been done by prior authors and what have to jot down in current search. After read the multi cross-cultural journals or books, writer has gained the knowledge in the particular area. From reading articles written by other authors, reader can improve his or her skills in linking his or her own ideas to the theories to applicatio ns and identify what research methodological analysis to be used in the current research either questionnaire, interviews, case studies, observational trial, experiment and so on. In doing a researchs literature review, writer has to going outside to contact experts in the particular arena to gain other knowledge, information, ideas before he or she start to write anything.The Importance of Literature ReviewThere are few types of literature review which are narrative, systematic and meta-analytic reviews. Narrative literature review in overall is the standard review of the literature, critically appraise and summarize the literature relevant to an determine topic (Hemingway Brereton 2009). This type of literature review is integral the points from the number of articles and cedeed as background reading immediately. This manakin of literature review tend to begin its selected topic with explanation of the rationale and by providing some theoretical or historical framework for th e research wallpaper and the reasons to examining studies relevant to the topic (Baun McMurray-Schwarz 2007).Another type of literature review is systematic literature review sometimes referred as best-evidence synthesis or practice establish research synthesis (Dunst 2009). This type of literature review is a thorough, comprehensive, transparent and unbiased review of the literature undertaken according to a clearly defined and systematic approach (Aveyard 2010 Neely et al., 2010). Systematic literature reviews are protracted processes that involve a focused cross-disciplinary search strategy with clearly tell criteria for inclusion and elimination of the literature (Berkeljon Baldwin, 2009).Moreover, there is one more type of literature review which is meta-analytic review. Meta-analytic review sometimes known as numeric systematic review, add a statistical review approach to measure the effect size and the aggregate studies relevant to the research question (Sun, Pang Wang 2010 Vetter, 2003). According to Humphrey (2011) stated that meta analysis should also provide readers with perspective so that findings are interpreted in a meaningful ways. early(a) than that, Neely et al (2010) utter that Every meta-analysis is based on underlying systematic review, but not every systematic review lead to meta-analysis.A research stick out is the make for informing or telling people with new knowledge or discovery. Literature review is important because it is a part of paper where research worker will be given an opportunity to strengthen the research paper by putting citation what other reliable authors had said rough your topic. To putting citation in the research paper is for the purpose of to proving that writer is not yet writing approximately any random subject but that many others have also poured their thoughts on the topic (Admin 2009). If without literature review which is no other reliable authors talking about the topic, it is only contain ing writers opinions about the fact that writer has discovered through his or her research. If the research project is just only contain with writers opinion, then how to further convince the readers? In this case, who will scrutinize writers research paper as he or she does not put any reliable evidence from previous authors who doing the same research in the particular field? Therefore, this is the need that is answered only by the literature review (Admin 2009). only by the fact that writer is using referencing by citing what more credible people had say about the topic will build a stronger foundation for your paper (Admin 2009). According to the University of Western Sydney (2010), states that literature review is important to build knowledge and to identify the methodology of research and seminal that work in the particular field that writer involve to. Moreover, literature review help writer to focus and refine the research question by convey the knowledge gap (University of Western Sydney, 2010).Literature review is to discover the problem of study however the problem of study can be solved by collection of info. It is important to know that what the police detective doing and how he or she worked from reading their research document and the current tec should not to duplicate the works done by previous police detective. Furthermore, by writing literature review, it able to help police detectives to improve their research design and instrumentation, which not successful at last time (Cottrell McKenzie 2011). According to Leary (2004), states that a well created literature review establishes creditability of the tec of the study, so he can get the entire eudaemonia of his work. Literature review is important because it is to resolve the research question and to deliver latest research temporal for readers.Procedures of Writing a Literature ReviewThe unconscious processs of writing a literature review include rig the topic or research question Identify the relevant information Inclusion or projection criteria and keywordsConduct the literature researchScreen all and exclude the irrelevant studiesScrutinize the relevant studiesselection data and develop graphic organizerssynthesise the findingsDevelop conclusion and recommendationsRhoadesDefine the Topic or explore QuestionThis is the initial step of start writing a literature review. During this step, it involves defining the specific topic and clear statement or review objectives or research question (Neely et al., 2010). The topic should be the researcher know enough about to determine whether it is viable researchable topic (University of South Australia). Successful applications usually birthation a well-defined research problem or area of focus linked to a body of literature that discusses some of the issues relevant to the proposed topic (University of South Australia). According to Aveyard (2010), stated that a good research question acts as a guide, clearly pro viding focus structure for the literature review process.Identify the relevant Information Inclusion or Exclusion Criteria and KeywordsAfter determine which topic to be organized, the next procedure is to identify the relevant information. By identifying the relevant information, researcher has to discuss a series of inclusion and exclusion criteria because the criteria have to fit with their review question and or the brief given by whoever is funding the project (Information and Computer Sciences). During doing the research and collecting the relevant information, researcher has to be cautious of any bias, be subjective, because researcher might introduce his or her bias into the review by adding certain inclusion or exclusion criteria.For example limiting to studies in English may miss important studies published in other languages (Information and Computer Sciences). Other than that, all decisions taken to include or exclude certain studies or groups of studies should be docume nted in the methods this way it can be seen that a systematic process has been followed(Information and Computer Sciences). If the researcher is doing dissertation research, the researcher has to show that the reason why chosen the particular topic to focus, and why the researcher has to excluded others.During this stage, the decisions from researcher are normally made by using the titles and abstract of the articles. Those that clearly irrelevant information is filter or exclude in this stage and those criteria which met are include in the review.Conduct the literature researchThe next step is to conduct the literature search by the identified keywords. Lucas Cutspec (2005) said that the search process involve a combination of many search tactics that include hand look for key journals and books, accessing the many electronic literature databases, investigating reference lists, and scanning the internet via multiple search engines, the latter likely to also include grey literatu re. Usually during searching process, there are included cross-disciplinary in that studies from various field of specialization. For example, there are numbers of journals within the broad disciplines, such as education, health, medicine as well as family-based and children- based psychology that may relevant to some topic that involving with children hearing loss (Rhoades, 2005). Literature search need to be careful as use of many search engines, electronic database and websites that are necessity for.Screen all and exclude the irrelevant studiesWhen all the journals, articles and papers are accumulated and abstracts are read, then need to classify the potential information that relevant to the research question (Hemingway Brereton 2009). After that screened all the irrelevant studies and exclude it, then screen again the relevant information to ensure the consistent relevant to the research question and all identified variables (Rhoades, 2005).Scrutinize the relevant studiesDuri ng this step, researcher has to scrutinize the relevant study. Another two independent reviewers have to be ensure that the consistency of the inclusion with the research question and protocol.Extract data and develop graphic organizersFindings from the studies of particular field are extracted from data extraction form which is tabulated data. Visual clarifiers can be acquired and formed from the tabulated data to facilitate knowledge of the similarities and differences between the relevant studies (Rhoades, 2005). There are number of variables extracted from the studies and the graphic organizer has to summarize the importance of the variables and the relationship of the variables with the studies. Rhoades (2005) stated that when data extracted for analysis and synthesis, the different studies may vary considerably. This is about when at this point, the determination is to make as to see the meta-analysis is appropriate or not. During this step, if the reviewers feel that the stud ies do not provide competent evidence, then, it is important to present the findings because lack of evidence to prove that their findings are reliable and it lead difficulty in publishing (Alderson Roberts, 2000).Synthesize the FindingsWith two independent reviewers, finding from each study are aggregated to produce bottom line on the clinical effectiveness, feasibility, appropriateness, and meaningfulness, of the intervention (Hemingway Brereton, 2009). Thus, the pool of findings is name as evidence synthesis (Rhoades, 2005). If the studies involve quantitative data or include not much of quantitative, meta-synthesis is provided in literature review (Rhoades, 2005). Conversely, if the studies involve sufficient evidence and quantitative data, the meta-analysis is conducted (Hemingway Brereton, 2009).Develop Conclusions and RecommendationsThis is the last step of the procedures in writing a literature review. During this stage, researcher has to include some introduction regard ing the studies, roughly review the overall structure of and the contents from the studies and then pinched conclusion from the findings of both secondary and primary research. The conclusion should state the crucial annotation and cover the strengths and weaknesses of the studies in the particular research. After drawn conclusion, provide some potential impact of the research conducted such as its contribution of knowledge or understanding, its contribution to theory development, its contribution to practice and applicant, and its implication for future research (Baker Foy). Thereafter, indicate some potential recommendation arise from the previous sections in term of the implication of findings (Baker Foy). Other than that, due to all studies have its own strong point and its shortcomings, thus, researcher can state some of the problematic issues arise when conducting the findings and what improvement should be done. Therefore, it is significant that researcher develop awarenes s of the problematic issues state in the review (Rhoades, 2005).SummaryLiterature review is a must to put in a research paper when researcher wish to write a research articles because it is essential to know what has been done by previous researchers in that particular studies and figure out what should be do in the current study to correct the mistake and error done by previous researchers. Thus, it is significant to read number of articles, journals, books from many elsewhere to gain knowledge from the particular studies in order to have a draft in mind what should be do. Furthermore, there are number of procedures to follow in order to write a good literature review because it may be read by others people to judge when the paper being published. Therefore, it is crucial to write a precise literature review to avoid mistakes or errors and get teasing by others.